Stop Using AI

(At least with your lawyer.)

AI is very useful but…

The allure of AI is undeniable. I present to lawyers—locally and nationally—about the expanding role AI will play in the legal profession.

But when something feels “too good to be true,” it usually is.

And while we’re still in the early days of the AI boom, we already know many of the pitfalls. Here’s one you may not be considering:

Using AI in your communications with your lawyer may be costing you more money than you think.

The pattern we’re seeing

More and more, clients are communicating with us through AI.

We can usually tell right away: the traditional font, the bolded subject headers, the tidy bullet points—and the tone. And in these emails (the length of which tends to be unmanageable), clients use AI to “explain” the law to us.

The problem is: these AI platforms always (and we do mean, always) steer clients in the wrong direction.

Most of the time, the “law” cited is just plain wrong.

For example, I asked ChatGPT to list the custody factors in Pennsylvania. It missed them.

Not most of them—all of them.

It created new custody factors, ignored the real factors, and tried to tell me I was wrong.

Why AI gets it wrong (even when it sounds right)

AI tools (including ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, and many others) do not know the law.

That’s a dangerous combination in a legal case where every move has a consequence.

The hidden cost: you pay for the cleanup

Attorneys spend three years in law school learning the law—but, more importantly, learning how to analyze it, synthesize it, and use their education and skills to represent you. They spend the rest of their careers sharpening those skills, building relationships, and learning how to navigate the legal system.

There is so much more to the practice of law than just the words in the Rules. The practice of law involves understanding the courts and our clients—and knowing how to strategize and plan to our clients’ advantage.

The documents AI drafts are nearly always wrong: they cite imaginary or incorrect rules, and they summarize the law incorrectly.

When this happens, we must spend hours:

AI isn’t saving you time.  It’s creating more work—and more costs—for you.

A better way to use AI (without letting it misdirect you)

We understand why clients turn to AI.

Legal jargon is confusing. The process can feel mysterious and frustrating. Continuing to find ways to conserve costs and better understand the legal process is commendable.

However, relying on AI as “truth”—or using it to guide your attorney’s strategy—is not advisable.

The costs are high:

If you’re using AI, tell your lawyer

Be open with your lawyer about your use of AI.

We already know you’re using it.

Help us understand what you’ve read and what concerns you—so we can better help you.

Talk to us so we can enhance how we represent you, using our experience, our education, and the relationships we have built with other lawyers, the court—and with you.

Human and robotic hands shaking above the words "Stopping AI" to illustrate why AI legal advice should not replace advice from an experienced Pennsylvania family law attorney.

Alimony Isn’t as Rare as You Think

Alimony isn’t as rare as you think. Growing up, when I heard the word “Alimony”, I thought of all the celebrity divorces that made headlines. Movies and TV shows always made it seem that alimony was only an option when there was a substantial amount of money in the marital estate. I always believed that if both parties in a divorce could or did work for a living, that alimony would not be an option. I held this belief up until law school. Even when I took my first Family Law class, and I was told Alimony was rarely granted and there had to be good reason for it.

It wasn’t until I started working in Family law that I realized this was not true. Alimony is an option for a lot of situations regardless of wealth level. Alimony, also known as maintenance or spousal support, is court ordered financial support that can be awarded in the divorce process. There are a few different types of Alimony, and the type is awarded based on the timing and need for the award. After a divorce complaint has been filed, a Court can award Alimony Pendente Lite (APL), which is temporary alimony awarded with the intent of helping the financially dependent spouse litigate the divorce. Spousal support can be awarded after parties separate but before a divorce is finalized to help the financially dependent spouse with living costs that they may not be able to shoulder themselves upon separating. Long term Alimony is a permanent or specified term of financial support that is awarded when the divorce is final. Courts consider a lot of factors when determining financial support for the dependent spouse, including the income difference and earning capacity between spouses, cost of living, need for support, and more!

Many people stay in unhappy relationships because they are worried about the financial strain of separation and litigating a divorce. If you’re like I was and think alimony is more of a myth than a real tool to help financially-dependent spouses, you may have more options than you think. Often, a family law attorney can advise you if you are a candidate for receiving support and help determine estimates of what a court may order. At the Law Offices of Jennifer J. Riley, we are proud to help our clients make informed decisions and pursue all support options that can help them through these difficult life transitions. Alimony isn’t as rare as you think.

Alimony isn't as rare as you think.

Special Education Mediation

Resolving your Special Education Dispute with Private Mediation

Conflicts between parents of children with special needs and their public school district can be contentious, emotional, and expensive. The stakes are always high in disputes involving children, especially when the child has complex needs that may be difficult to identify or expensive to meet. School districts and parents often disagree about whether a child is eligible for special education services, what those services should be, where the child should attend school, and who is responsible for paying for the child’s evaluations, services, and placement.

While most parties resolve their disputes without going to court or an administrative Due Process hearing, those that wind up in adversarial litigation often face staggering legal fees and judgments that sometimes exceed the cost of providing the services to the child. Litigation is also time-consuming and inherently risky for both parties, which can be very problematic for those trying to meet the needs of a vulnerable child.

Whether you are hoping to avoid litigation or trying to settle a dispute that is already in court or a hearing, private Mediation could be a powerful option to help you resolve your conflict efficiently, effectively, and peacefully.

If you’re interested in learning what Mediation is, why and how it works, and how it compares to litigation, check out these resources: [links to Mediation Blog, Mediation FAQ, Mediation vs. Litigation].

While private Mediation can be helpful for resolving most special education disputes, it may be especially effective when: 

Delay in resolution poses serious risk of irreparable harm to the child.

At the heart of every special education dispute is a child. Parents and school districts share an interest in meeting the needs of that child and ensuring that the child does not pay the price for their dispute. The timeframe for litigation is typically measured in months or years, while mediation is usually completed in a matter of days or weeks. When the child is counting on the parents and the district to resolve their dispute as quickly as possible, Mediation may be the fastest, most efficient, and most effective way forward.

The parties expect to be working together for years to come.

Children with special needs often remain eligible for special education services from their school districts even after they are no longer children. In Pennsylvania, students may be eligible until the end of the school year in which they turn 21. Thus, many parents and districts that are in conflict must continue working together long after a judge or hearing officer decides their case. Adversarial litigation rarely strengthens the relationships between the parties and often damages them permanently. By contrast, Mediation offers the parties a way to build trust and basic communication skills that will help them avoid and resolve conflicts effectively in the future. Mediation builds bridges that the parties cannot afford to burn.

The dispute involves very complex facts.

Special education matters can involve extremely complex facts concerning a child’s needs, progress, educational testing, and programming, often over many years and involving dozens of teachers, specialists, meetings, evaluations, and voluminous records. Courts are ill-equipped to understand these facts and to appreciate the contexts in which they occur. While special education Hearing Officers are better equipped than most judges to make sense of the specialized issues in these matters, Hearing Officers often have limited authority to impose remedies or solutions to the problems the parties face in these cases. Private Mediation with an experienced special education Mediator offers the parties the opportunity to craft creative, flexible agreements that are tailored to the unique facts of their case, with the help of a skilled, neutral Mediator who has expertise in both special education conflict resolution.

The case involves novel or unsettled legal issues

Whenever someone else is deciding the outcome of your conflict – including a judge or hearing officer – the outcome is inherently uncertain. Risks abound even when your matter is like others that came before and when the legal issues are common and well-settled. So, when your dispute involves novel or unsettled legal issues, litigation can feel more like high stakes gambling than a reliable dispute resolution process. In these cases, the benefits of Mediation are even more pronounced. Parties to a Mediation retain complete control over the outcome of their matter and neither party risks incurring the costs of an adverse decision that could establish even costlier precedent for future cases. The riskier and less certain the outcome of your litigation, the more prudent it is to attempt Mediation.

The matter involves a dispute over legal fees.

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) contains a “fee-shifting” provision under which parents may petition a federal court for an Order requiring their school district to pay their reasonable attorney’s fees when the parents prevail against the district in an administrative due process hearing. Less commonly, a district may seek reimbursement of its legal fees against the parents. In many cases, legal fees approach or even exceed the cost of the disputed services or placement for the child. Sometimes, the only issue that the parties are “stuck” on is the payment of attorney’s fees. Fee disputes can take months, or even years, to resolve in court, and are fraught with risk for both sides. With the help of an experienced special education Mediator, the parties can often resolve these disputes faster and avoid incurring additional “fees on fees” – the legal fees associated with litigating the fee dispute itself.

We can help.

Contact us today to learn more about how we can help you resolve your special education dispute efficiently, effectively, and peacefully.

For more about mediation, click here.